Enter your details:
Name:
E-mail:
 
Thank you for subscribing.
Subscribe to our newsletter!


Ahmed A. Ramadan1, Mohamed H. Sobhy1, Tarek Mohamed Samy1, Yahia Haroun1, Ahmed Hany Khater1

1Orthopedic Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University

Objective Outcomes of All-inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with and Without Internal Suture Augmentation Technique: Randomized Controlled Trial

Sport Mont 2022, 20(2), 95-101 | DOI: 10.26773/smj.220615

Abstract

To report and compare patient outcomes (PROs) (IKDC score, Lysholm Score) and knee laxity using Lachmeter -The digital Rolimeter ® - among patients who underwent hamstrings autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with and without internal tape augmentation. Randomized trial of 41 patients in which 21 patients underwent all-inside ACLR with internal suture augmentation (Group I, Brace group) and 20 patients underwent all-inside ACLR without internal suture augmentation (Group II, non-brace group). Primary outcomes Lachmeter examinations and PROs were analyzed at 3,6,9 months postoperative. Secondary outcomes were graft failure, synovitis, and infection. Mean follow-up duration was 18 months ± 3.4. Date was expressed as Mean±SD for quantitative parametric data or number and percentage for categorized data. Delta change (dC) principle was used to test the actual mathematical change in the outcomes between 0-9 months and 3-9 months intervals postoperative. Lysholm score at 9-months was significant and better in brace group mean: 94 (92.4-96.5), p<0.005. Postoperative Lachmeter at 3,9 months was significant with less laxity in brace group mean: 1.98 (1.89- 2.07), 2.14 (2.06-2.22) p<0.005. dC Lachmeter in both intervals was significant with less laxity in brace group mean: .09 (.06-.11) p<0.001. dC IKDC score was significant in 3-9 months interval mean: .31 (.28-.35) p<0.001. dC Lysholm score was significant in 0-9 months interval mean: .86 (.72-.99) p<0.001. Both scores were better in brace-group. One graft failure was reported in Group II and one case of synovitis in Group I. All-inside ACLR with brace showed better laxity measures and lower failure rate at 9-months postoperative. However, the subjective functional outcomes did not show clear evidence of superiority in the suture tape augmentation group.

Keywords

Lachmeter, IKDC, Lysholm, all-inside ACLR, internal suture augmentation, randomized controlled trial Clinical trial registration number (TRN): NCT04906538 on 05/28/2021



View full article
(PDF – 369KB)

References

Adams, D., Logerstedt, D., Hunter-Giordano, A., Axe, M. J., & Snyder-Mackler, L. (2012). Current Concepts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Criterion-Based Rehabilitation Progression. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 42(7), 601-614. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2012.3871

Bachmaier, S., Smith, P. A., Bley, J., & Wijdicks, C. A. (2018). Independent Suture Tape Reinforcement of Small and Standard Diameter Grafts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Full Construct Model. Arthroscopy, 34(2), 490-499. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2017.10.037

Blackman, A. J., & Stuart, M. J. (2014). All-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Journal of Knee Surgery, 27(5), 347-352. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1381960

Cerulli, G., Zamarra, G., Vercillo, F., & Pelosi, F. (2011). ACL reconstruction with “the original all-inside technique”. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 19(5), 829-831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1371-2

Connaughton, A. J., Geeslin, A. G., & Uggen, C. W. (2017). All-inside ACL reconstruction: How does it compare to standard ACL reconstruction techniques? Journal of Orthopaedics, 14(2), 241-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2017.03.002

Daniel, D. M., Malcom, L. L., Losse, G., Stone, M. L., Sachs, R., & Burks, R. (1985). Instrumented measurement of anterior laxity of the knee. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 67(5), 720-726.

Ganko, A., Engebretsen, L., & Ozer, H. (2000). The rolimeter: a new arthrometer compared with the KT-1000. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 8(1), 36-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001670050008

George, M. S., Dunn, W. R., & Spindler, K. P. (2006). Current Concepts Review: Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 34(12), 2026-2037. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546506295026

Li, G., Defrate, L. E., Rubash, H. E., & Gill, T. J. (2005). In vivo kinematics of the ACL during weight-bearing knee flexion. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 23(2), 340-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orthres.2004.08.006

Lubowitz, J. H. (2006). No-Tunnel Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: The Transtibial All-Inside Technique. Arthroscopy, 22(8), 900.e901-900.e911. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2006.06.003

Lubowitz, J. H., Amhad, C. H., & Anderson, K. (2011). All-Inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft-Link Technique: Second-Generation, No-Incision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Arthroscopy, 27(5), 717-727. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2011.02.008

Lubowitz, J. H., MacKay, G., & Gilmer, B. (2014). Knee Medial Collateral Ligament and Posteromedial Corner Anatomic Repair With Internal Bracing. Arthroscopy Techniques, 3(4), e505-e508. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2014.05.008

Marumo, K., Saito, M., Yamagishi, T., & Fujii, K. (2005). The “Ligamentization” Process in Human Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Autogenous Patellar and Hamstring Tendons:A Biochemical Study. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 33(8), 1166-1173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546504271973

Ménétrey, J., Duthon, V. B., Laumonier, T., & Fritschy, D. (2008). “Biological failure” of the anterior cruciate ligament graft. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 16(3), 224-231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-007-0474-x

Parkes, C. W., Leland, D. P., Levy, B. A., Stuart, M. J., Camp, C. L., Saris, D. B. F., & Krych, A. J. (2021). Hamstring Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using an All-Inside Technique With and Without Independent Suture Tape Reinforcement. Arthroscopy, 37(2), 609-616. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2020.09.002

Samitier, G., Marcano, A. I., Alentorn-Geli, E., Cugat, R., Farmer, K. W., & Moser, M. W. (2015). Failure of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery, 3(4), 220-240.

Smith, P. A., & Bley, J. A. (2016). Allograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Utilizing Internal Brace Augmentation. Arthroscopy Techniques, 5(5), e1143-e1147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2016.06.007

Smith, P. A., Bradley, J. P., Konicek, J., Bley, J. A., & Wijdicks, C. A. (2020). Independent Suture Tape Internal Brace Reinforcement of Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Allografts: Biomechanical Assessment in a Full-ACL Reconstruction Laboratory Model. Journal of Knee Surgery, 33(10), 1047-1054. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1692649

van Eck, C. F., Limpisvasti, O., & ElAttrache, N. S. (2018). Is There a Role for Internal Bracing and Repair of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament? A Systematic Literature Review. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 46(9), 2291-2298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546517717956

Viens, N. A., Wijdicks, C. A., Campbell, K. J., LaPrade, R. F., & Clanton, T. O. (2014). Anterior Talofibular Ligament Ruptures, Part 1:Biomechanical Comparison of Augmented Broström Repair Techniques With the Intact Anterior Talofibular Ligament. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 42(2), 405-411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546513510141

Wang, H. D., Zhang, H., Wang, T. R., Zhang, W. F., Wang, F. S., & Zhang, Y. Z. (2018). Comparison of clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft versus soft-tissue allograft: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. International Journal of Surgery, 56, 174-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.06.030